<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your website is more important than social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.auctioneertech.com/2009/your-website-is-more-important-than-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.auctioneertech.com/2009/your-website-is-more-important-than-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Technology, auctions and auctioneers - auction tech for the auction industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:10:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.auctioneertech.com/2009/your-website-is-more-important-than-social-networking/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auctioneertech.com/?p=1569#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Brilliant. My one point of difference is while you are absolutely on target re: Facebook, LinkedIn etc., Twitter seems to have evolved into a different animal for two reasons: (1) It doesn&#039;t do as good a job of enabling interactive conversations that other people can easily follow, and (b) It can reach a much broader audience -- far beyond your followers. (I now see Twitter followers as almost irrelevant and don&#039;t do anything to add them.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those two Twitter traits are making it less personal by its nature, so people there now follow topics/hashes more than people, and that makes outright business promotion (e.g. auction announcements) more acceptable. If somebody&#039;s got a search set on #duluth, they don&#039;t much care about the poster, just whether it interests them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant. My one point of difference is while you are absolutely on target re: Facebook, LinkedIn etc., Twitter seems to have evolved into a different animal for two reasons: (1) It doesn&#39;t do as good a job of enabling interactive conversations that other people can easily follow, and (b) It can reach a much broader audience &#8212; far beyond your followers. (I now see Twitter followers as almost irrelevant and don&#39;t do anything to add them.) </p>
<p>Those two Twitter traits are making it less personal by its nature, so people there now follow topics/hashes more than people, and that makes outright business promotion (e.g. auction announcements) more acceptable. If somebody&#39;s got a search set on #duluth, they don&#39;t much care about the poster, just whether it interests them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.auctioneertech.com/2009/your-website-is-more-important-than-social-networking/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auctioneertech.com/?p=1569#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Brilliant. My one point of difference is while you are absolutely on target re: Facebook, LinkedIn etc., Twitter seems to have evolved into a different animal for two reasons: (1) It doesn&#039;t do as good a job of enabling interactive conversations that other people can easily follow, and (b) It can reach a much broader audience -- far beyond your followers. (I now see Twitter followers as almost irrelevant and don&#039;t do anything to add them.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those two Twitter traits are making it less personal by its nature, so people there now follow topics/hashes more than people, and that makes outright business promotion (e.g. auction announcements) more acceptable. If somebody&#039;s got a search set on #duluth, they don&#039;t much care about the poster, just whether it interests them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant. My one point of difference is while you are absolutely on target re: Facebook, LinkedIn etc., Twitter seems to have evolved into a different animal for two reasons: (1) It doesn&#39;t do as good a job of enabling interactive conversations that other people can easily follow, and (b) It can reach a much broader audience &#8212; far beyond your followers. (I now see Twitter followers as almost irrelevant and don&#39;t do anything to add them.) </p>
<p>Those two Twitter traits are making it less personal by its nature, so people there now follow topics/hashes more than people, and that makes outright business promotion (e.g. auction announcements) more acceptable. If somebody&#39;s got a search set on #duluth, they don&#39;t much care about the poster, just whether it interests them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
